Review of Exploring Certainty: Wittgenstein and Wide Fields of Thought by Robert Greenleaf Brice in Philosophical Investigations, Volume 39, Issue 1.
It is easy for me to forget that Gilbert Ryle’s The Concept of Mind was published in 1949, four years before the posthumous publication of Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations. In a letter to Norman Malcolm in 1950, Wittgenstein writes “I can’t say that Ryle’s book worries me. Perhaps it ought to, but it doesn’t.” The worry, it seems, is about some of his own ideas appearing in Ryle’s book rather than in a publication by himself. The view that Ryle had borrowed some of his ideas is perhaps what Wittgenstein is alluding to in a conversation with O. K. Bouwsma. He reports Wittgenstein saying that “Ryle had been good when he was young. Now he just borrowed other men’s thoughts. I suggested this was due to the burden of administrative duties. But W. said it was much worse.” More insight into what Wittgenstein thought of Ryle is found in some other letters that have been collected in Wittgenstein in Cambridge: Letters and Documents 1911–1951, along with the comments by the editor Brian McGuinness.
It appears that at one point Wittgenstein had some affection for Ryle. In a letter to G. E. Moore from 1936, he asks Moore “to give him my love.” The sentence that immediately follows expresses a low opinion of his philosophical talent, but a high one of Ryle as a person; referring to a talk that Ryle delivered, perhaps to the Moral Science Club at Cambridge, Wittgenstein writes: “I can quite imagine that he didn’t read a good paper and also that he was nice and decent and agreeable in the discussion.”
“Nature has joined men at the heart, and the professors would like them to be joined at the head.” G. C. Lichtenberg Which type of union is more secure? Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment portrays the former to be the stronger. Not only can we not be united through our heads; our heads…
A new issue of Film-Philosophy has been published and it includes an article by me: The Facts Before Our Eyes: Wittgenstein and the Film Noir Investigator In this article, I compare the methods of the film noir investigator to solve crimes and those of Wittgenstein to solve (dissolve) philosophical problems. The hope…
[portfolio_slideshow] I took these photos while in Austria in 2008 for the International Wittgenstein Symposium.
These are two reviews that have been written on my book Wittgenstein on Rules and Nature: James Fielding in Philosophical Investigations Lars Hertzberg in Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews
Review of Wittgenstein on Rules and Nature in Philosophical Investigations by James Fielding.